Charles Jones' Blog

I have long been a believer in the benefits that memberships in, and support of, industry trade associations provide to businesses. Trade association events represent opportunities to stay ahead of trends, learn of potential regulatory issues, and network among peers all working in the same space.

To me, it creates opportunities for companies to transcend barriers and work in concert with competitors toward shared goals to elevate an “industry” to a community. I’m a people-person, so networking has been one of the most compelling reasons for me to attend events sponsored by such groups. However, this year, given the pandemic, it has been somewhat of a challenge to reap these benefits.

Some associations have cancelled events, others rescheduled into next calendar year, and still some chose a digital experience. The latter I find intriguing.

Like business and government entities, associations have reimagined how to support their members and industry without the benefit of in-person events. This has led to much innovation for these associations and groups with different ways to provide education, and conferences online. For example, both the New Jersey Land Title Association and the Pennsylvania Land Title Association have gone exclusively online with their continuing education in order to continue to serve their members’ credit’s needs.
In addition, shows that I normally attend in person have gone virtual and this includes the American Land Title Association’s ALTA One and the Pennsylvania Land Title Association Annual Convention.

While Continuing Education has demonstrated that a video-conferenced instructor has been able to share the same knowledge (and arguably with a larger audience given that the travel time to and from a physical event is now off the table), I will be very curious to see how the networking aspect of these shows will work. Meeting, or furthering relationships online, as opposed to in-person has, and will have, its challenges. But the more I think about it, I realize we have so many relationships that are sustained almost strictly online. Consider your Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram or Twitter connections. How many of these people do you ever see in person? Once a year, twice maybe? Some probably virtually never.

The digital conference may offer a similar experience. It won’t be better or worse. It will be different. Check back in October after both ALTA One and the PLTA Annual Convention for my blog that will discuss my take on virtual networking. Meanwhile, what do you think?

By Patrick T. Roe, General Manager

Has your opinion of Remote Online Notarization (RON) changed since the pandemic? RON “is when documents are notarized in an electronic form where the signer uses an electronic signature and appears before the notary using online audio-video technology.”[1] As up on technology as I am, I admit, I had reservations about it. I was concerned it could lead to further deed fraud, as I had read of serious instances of that in Philadelphia and inNew York City even with an in-person notary.

Perhaps you had similar concerns. But then the scourge of the pandemic caused government and businesses, like ours, to re-think and, in many cases, change the way work is conducted. RON appears to be here to stay. This is evidenced by a Bipartisan bill introduced for remote online notary nationwide, an increase in remote online notarizations during the pandemic, Remote Online Notarization Legislation - HB 2370 & SB 1097 in Pennsylvania,and Remote Notary Services Get A (Temporary) Green light in New Jersey.  

Like other changes, RON has and will continue to lead to additional challenges for our industry. The good news is that our national organization, the American Land Title Association (ALTA) teamed with the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), National Association of Realtors (NAR), vendors and notary experts to develop the “The Securing an Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020”. It includes important security safeguards such as:

  • Require tamper-evident technology in electronic notarizations.
  • Provide fraud prevention through use of multifactor
    authentication for identity proofing and audio-visual recording of the notarial
  • Builds
    on the foundations of the Interstate Recognition of Notarizations (IRON Act of
    2011), while adding additional consumer safeguards.

Click here to read more specifics.

In just a few months’ time, our industry has transformed itself. Staff and leadership at companies (and government entities) were forced out of their comfort zones to evaluate processes in order to continue to meet customers’ needs while social distancing.

An increased use of RON may provide those with nefarious intent another avenue to commit fraud. However, important safeguards (like those listed above) and the eagle eye of title professionals, and others involved in real estate transactions, can keep this to a minimum. I have no doubt our industry will rise to the occasion; it always has.

How has or will RON impact your business?


Patrick T. Roe, General Manager

Check out our new blog with guest author Joseph A. Grabas, CTP, NTP. The title is “Expedite Title Production with Title Plants” and includes a historical perspective as well as current benefits access to title plants can provide.

Want to expedite your title production? Utilizing a title plant can do
just that.

Robust Database Technology has arrived on the doorstep of the New Jersey
Land Title Industry, after years of wandering through a post-modernist
malaise.  “Paper” Back Title Plants have been replaced by a technology that has been available west of the Mississippi for decades.  In 1664, the Wild West began at the Jersey shoreline and steadily expanded towards the setting sun, but advanced database technology in the title industry has rebounded back from the Pacific Coast and is now a reality in New Jersey today!

Some history…

The concept of a Title Plant was facilitated by the passage of the Land
Ordinance Act of 1785.  Within this Act was a system of surveying originally proposed by Thomas Jefferson, who saw flaws in the metes and bounds system generally in use in the 13 original colonies, which located properties by reference to a “large black birch with three blazes” or “the point in the stream where two men once fought” or “Beginning at a large crustaceous.”  This new system, referred to as the Public Land Survey System (PLSS), instead relied upon a grid consisting of intersections of principal meridians and baselines.

What does this have to do with Title Plants?  It allowed the creation of land record indexes based upon geographic location rather than alphabetic name ownership.  New Jersey’s earliest recording statutes required an alphabetical index in well bound books.  In 1889 when Los Angeles County established one of the earliest title plants in the country, New Jersey had already indexed 225 years of land records chronologically by the names of the owners.

A 1967 publication of The American Land Title Association’s TitleNews included an article titled, “Creation and Maintenance of a Title Plant”. Even then, there was concern over the time it took to clear title, as well as interest in the benefits a private title plant could provide. The article reads in part, “The increasing time consumption in tracing titles through these name indexes gave the impetus to the private plant. Private plants are not mere copies of the public records, but a re-organization of them ... the title searcher in the
private plant quite often looks in but two places - a single tract or location index, and a single name index. Contrast this with the public records where there may be as many as twenty places or more where a search must be made.”[1]

In many western states a certified Title Plant is required by law as a
prerequisite to all title insurance operations. By the late 1960s, just a
couple of decades after the ENIAC computer was put to work calculating
artillery trajectories in WWII,  that same technology was being put to use out West, helping title plants go digital.[2]

Meanwhile, back in New Jersey the majority of title searchers created and used paper “Back Title Plants.”  These
were generally index card-based systems that each contained the “Back Title” to a particular tract of land which usually coincided with a Filed Map, Subdivision or Condominium regime.  So, if a title searcher were to conduct research on a particular lot that appears on one of those maps, by referencing the card, they could get the Grants, Easements and Restrictions affecting the entire subdivision.  Then the search could begin at that point and be brought forward.

Yet there were attempts at creating a Western style title plant in New Jersey.  One example was the Chelsea Title Plant in Atlantic County.  It was an exact copy of all the documents contained in the Atlantic County Clerk’s Office and was updated daily.  The difference being that it was indexed geographically.  According to George Piccola, longtime expert Title Searcher and past frequent user, “the Chelsea Title Plant was close to being a perfect source of title information for a non-computer era.”

He added, “All the premises were indexed by Municipalities, with each Municipality being further broken down into a book per Block, with each Lot being a separate page with all sales transactions per lot, essentially a "Chain of Title" per each Lot in each Block in each Municipality. These listings for each Lot per Block per Municipality were recorded from 1920 to 1970, when it stopped.  Basically, a complete analysis for each
Lot/Block/Town per County. They also had separate books for each transaction out of each developer by Lot/Block/Town per County.”  Unfortunately, that plant has been lost to time.

The other example of a type of Title Plant that is still in use today can be found in the Hudson County Register’s Office.  It is referred to as the County Block System and is authorized by N.J.S.A 46:24-7. 
Hudson County is the only county that ever implemented this system.

It is an invaluable tool for title searchers working in that county
because it provides a geographical index of the land records up through 1984.  Every Block in Hudson County was assigned a County Block in addition to a Municipal Tax Block.  As each land title document was recorded one gentleman (The County Block Guy) would examine them and determine which County Block the property described was located in. 
He would assign the County Block number and then enter that document
Book and Page under the corresponding County Block and Lot found in the County Block books.  So, a title searcher can go to the County Block Book and immediately get the entire chain of title for a specific property, all in one place.  Of course the title searcher would still have to search every property owner shown in the chain of title in the Grantor Index to make sure that the County Block Guy didn’t make a mistake or that there weren’t any documents recorded that did not have a proper description, but still affected the title, e.g., judgments, liens, agreements, etc.  Eventually the County Block Guy retired, and the system was no longer updated.

In 1978, the American Land Title Association devoted an entire issue of
its Title News to the questions of automation and computerization.[3]  It is a fascinating look back on how business leaders in the title industry were thinking about the benefits of the impending computer age.  Even though the internet
would not be invented for another 5 years and not functionally available until 1990, when Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web, the title industry was already considering how to leverage the power of technology to expedite title production.  But New Jersey would have to wait until 2003, before that technology would be employed in this State, to
create a robust land title database that would allow for both geographic and name search capabilities.

In 2003, DataTrace® began collecting data and documents in New Jersey, including records dating back to the early 1980s as part of its private data collection, hosted by DataTrace System (DTS). It currently includes almost 38.5 Million records and images covering 15 of the 21 counties in New Jersey.  Click here for a list.

The primary difference between online data provided by government
entities and what the DataTrace Title Plant offers, is the indexing of records geographically and the clear listing index (i.e., chain of title) returned when searching the plant itself.  Instruments in DTS are cross-indexed by trained land title professionals three ways – in contrast to the county’s single-indexing approach (alphabetical name index) – which helps the DTS users locate and capture relevant information and documents in a fraction of the time required to search the County Land Records.  A DTS search completed in minutes could take hours in the Record Room or the County Online Search systems, sifting through numerous unrelated documents by name.

Charles Jones LLC uses the DTS Title Plant to expedite its own County
Search Services, while also providing direct access to title operations doing business in New Jersey. Searches can be conveniently done anytime and anywhere.

The New Jersey land title industry may have been a few decades late to
the party, but there is no excuse for not embracing the available technology today.  You must be a 21st
Century Thinker!  Put down the sledge hammer and pick up a jack hammer, put down the buggy whip and get in your electric car, throw away your typewriter and fire up your computer and consider how Title Plant technology can offer you a competitive edge, lower your costs, increase your performance and responsiveness and expedite your Title Production. 

Be a 21st Century Thinker.

For a further historic discussion of Mid-West title plants go to

Information Services Blog, The Evolution
of Title Plants -


Blog Archive

Charles Jones LLC is not a consumer reporting agency as such term is defined in the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 USC 1681 et seq. ("FCRA"). Charles Jones reports do not constitute consumer reports as such term is defined in the FCRA, and accordingly these reports may not be used to determine eligibility for credit, employment, tenant screening or for any other purpose provided for in the FCRA.